A Power-Positive Data Center Partnership
POSITION PAPER
Jonah Ritter, Citizen
THE POSITION
New York should welcome major data centers only when their developers add more dependable generating capacity than their facilities consume, pay the costs they impose, strengthen the grid, and produce enforceable benefits for the host community. Niagara Falls is the natural place to begin.
Benefits at a Glance
- Adds new electricity supply instead of merely adding demand to the existing grid.
- Places downward pressure on long-term energy costs by increasing dependable supply.
- Makes the developer, rather than ordinary ratepayers, finance project-driven generation and grid improvements.
- Improves reliability through new generation, storage, modern substations, transmission upgrades, and demand response.
- Gives utilities access to additional dependable supply and useful new infrastructure without placing the project's financing burden on their existing customers.
- Uses private and international capital to move generation forward faster while preserving public safety and environmental review.
- Uses Niagara's existing energy and industrial infrastructure as a platform for contributing more power to New York.
- Captures data-center waste heat for nearby factories, schools, hospitals, government buildings, housing, and greenhouses.
- Returns former industrial property to productive use while protecting residential neighborhoods and farmland.
- Creates construction work, permanent technical jobs, local contracts, workforce training, and new tax revenue.
- Helps attract additional manufacturers seeking dependable electricity and lower-cost heat.
- Gives New York a constructive alternative to either banning data centers or allowing them to burden the public grid.
Executive Summary
Data centers are becoming essential infrastructure for artificial intelligence, banking, healthcare, communications, commerce, national security, and everyday internet services. They also require extraordinary amounts of continuous electricity. A large facility may demand 100 megawatts or more - an amount comparable to the annual electricity use of tens of thousands of homes.
That demand becomes a public problem when it is simply placed upon an existing grid already facing rising loads, transmission constraints, an aging generation fleet, and the need for substantial new investment. New Yorkers should not be required to subsidize the power needs or infrastructure risks of one enormous private customer.
But rejecting data centers is not an energy policy. It sends investment elsewhere while leaving New York's shortage of dependable, affordable power unsolved. The better approach is collaboration with firm conditions: major data-center developers should build or finance new generation greater than their own needs, export the excess through approved market and interconnection arrangements, fund required grid upgrades, participate in emergency demand reduction, recover useful waste heat, and guarantee benefits for the host community.
This paper calls that approach the Power-Positive Data Center Partnership. It recommends establishing the first such development district in the Niagara Falls region.
THE KEY WORD IS "EXISTING"
The central problem is not simply that data centers use a great deal of electricity. The problem is what happens when their demand is imposed upon the existing public system.
When enormous new loads arrive faster than dependable supply, electricity costs can rise, expensive substations and transmission facilities may be required, reliability margins can shrink, and older generators may have to operate longer. Unless the rules are established in advance, some costs or risks can be shifted to households and existing employers.
The answer is not complicated: do not allow a major new electrical load to arrive alone. Require it to arrive with new power.
Political Courage, Not Political Opportunity
Politicians can make themselves appear to be heroes for ordinary citizens by campaigning against the 'big, bad data centers.' It is an easy position. Data centers are large, unfamiliar, and owned by powerful companies. A politician can oppose one, claim to have protected the public, and collect votes without solving New York's underlying energy problem.
That is short-sighted political opportunism, not leadership. Data centers are coming because the modern economy requires them. New York can reject the investment, jobs, tax revenue, and technical development, or it can demonstrate the courage and creative thinking required to turn a huge new demand for power into an opportunity to build new supply.
The answer is not simply to stop data centers. The answer is to require them to help solve the problem they would otherwise make worse.
The Power-Positive Partnership
New York should adopt one clear principle:
A data center should bring new power to New York - not merely consume the power New York already has.
Suppose a proposed data center requires 100 megawatts of continuous power. The developer should be required to build or finance a new generating and storage system capable of serving that load while adding a defined amount of dependable net capacity for the wider system. The exact margin should be established through engineering and reliability review rather than a political slogan, but it must be measurable, additional, and enforceable.
The data center would ordinarily take its power behind the meter. Excess generation would be exported under NYISO, utility, environmental, and market rules. New York already recognizes behind-the-meter net generation, in which a generator serves a host load and has the ability to export excess electricity. The proposal expands that concept into a public-benefit requirement for exceptionally large loads.
How Utility Companies Benefit
Utility companies should not view this arrangement merely as an accommodation for a very large customer. Properly structured, it can provide the utility and its existing customers with additional dependable supply, stronger local infrastructure, and a better-balanced system.
A power-positive campus can add generation, storage, modern substations, and transmission improvements at the location where new demand is being created. The utility gains another source of electricity and operational flexibility without having to finance the entire project through customer rates. During periods of high demand or system stress, contracted exports, stored energy, and demand reductions by the data center can provide additional tools for maintaining reliability.
Additional efficient generation can also increase competition in the wholesale market. It should not be promised that one project will automatically lower every customer's bill, because retail bills contain many costs and market conditions change. But increasing dependable, competitively priced supply - especially in the right location - can reduce upward pressure on wholesale prices and help avoid more expensive emergency solutions.
The developer also brings something utilities and governments do not always have readily available: rapid access to large pools of private capital. Major technology and infrastructure companies can raise money through international capital markets, institutional investors, private-equity funds, pension funds, banks, and long-term energy partners. The generating plant can therefore be financed principally by investors accepting the project's risk, rather than by families through utility rates or by taxpayers through government borrowing.
Private financing does not eliminate regulation. Power plants, transmission connections, water systems, and data centers must still satisfy applicable state, federal, local, environmental, and reliability requirements. The advantage is that one financially capable development team can coordinate the load, generation, storage, and construction schedule as a single investment. Federal regulators are now recognizing that studying associated load and generation together can reduce unnecessary grid upgrades and make interconnection faster and less costly.
How Government Can Help
Government's role should be neither passive approval nor automatic obstruction. It should establish demanding public standards and then clear an efficient path for projects willing to meet them.
New York is competing with Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and other states for data centers, power investment, construction activity, technical jobs, and the industries that will grow around artificial intelligence. Developers compare sites according to power availability, approval time, infrastructure, cost, community support, and regulatory certainty. Delay can be the same as rejection: capital moves to the state that is prepared to act.
Government therefore has to think more like a competitive entrepreneur. It must recognize an opportunity, assemble the necessary partners, anticipate obstacles, set a timetable, and make a convincing offer before another state does. That does not mean lowering safety, environmental, labor, or community standards. It means making the requirements clear at the beginning and coordinating the agencies responsible for enforcing them.
New York should designate one accountable project team to coordinate state and local review; establish a single public schedule for environmental, energy, water, zoning, and interconnection decisions; allow related generation and load to be studied together; identify pre-screened industrial sites; and give qualified power-positive projects priority without guaranteeing their approval.
Fast-tracking should mean faster decisions, not weaker decisions. Projects should earn expedited treatment by committing to new dependable generation, full cost responsibility, transparent water and emissions plans, enforceable community benefits, and meaningful excess power for the grid.
Some politicians are moving in the opposite direction. They treat delay, blanket resistance, or a moratorium as proof that they are protecting the public. That may produce an easy headline, but it can also drive private investment, jobs, tax revenue, and new power generation into competing states. A state that only knows how to say no will eventually watch other states build the infrastructure of the future.
Real leadership is harder. It protects the public while finding a way to say yes to a project that leaves New York with more power, stronger infrastructure, and greater opportunity than it had before.
Why Niagara Falls Is the Natural Location
A Great Energy Foundation - But Not a Free Supply
The Niagara Power Project in Lewiston is New York's largest electricity producer and can generate up to 2,600 megawatts of clean hydropower. That electricity is already serving utilities, public bodies, municipal systems, industries, and residents. A new data center should not consume a large portion of that existing resource or compete with current employers for low-cost power.
It must contribute to the supply. Niagara's hydropower and energy expertise should serve as the foundation for a larger system, not as an excuse for placing another immense load on the region.
Infrastructure for Contributing to the Grid
Niagara already has major generating facilities, transmission corridors, substations, industrial land, energy professionals, and decades of experience moving large volumes of electricity. This makes the region a natural place to connect new generation to the grid, subject to detailed engineering studies.
The developer should finance every new substation, transmission line, storage facility, or related upgrade primarily required by the project. Properly designed, those improvements could do more than connect one data center: they could reduce bottlenecks, strengthen regional reliability, and prepare industrial sites for future employers.
The test is simple: after the data center is operating, does Niagara have more dependable power available or less? If the answer is less, the proposal has failed.
Water and Climate
Data centers produce great quantities of heat and require dependable cooling. Western New York's Great Lakes location, colder winters, and moderate annual temperatures offer an advantage over hot, dry regions. Outside air can provide part of the cooling during much of the year, reducing mechanical cooling demand.
Regional water abundance is not permission for unlimited consumption. Any project must protect drinking water, aquatic life, and the Niagara River, and should use closed-loop or other highly efficient cooling wherever practical. Water withdrawals, treatment, and discharge must be independently reviewed and publicly disclosed.
Industrial Land and Economic Need
Niagara Falls has industrially zoned land, legacy utility corridors, transportation connections, and former industrial properties that may be suitable for careful redevelopment. Proper siting can return underused land to productive use rather than consuming farmland or intruding upon residential neighborhoods.
The city also has a real need for durable investment. Census estimates for 2020-2024 place Niagara Falls' median household income at $49,101 and its poverty rate at 23.7 percent. The community that helped power New York's industrial development should be a priority for the next generation of energy and technology investment.
Data centers do not employ as many people as the great factories of the past, and advocates should not pretend otherwise. Their local value comes from large construction programs, specialized permanent positions, service contracts, infrastructure investment, and a substantial tax base. Those benefits must be secured in writing.
Turn Waste Heat Into a Second Energy Resource
Almost all electricity used by servers ultimately becomes heat. Ordinarily, cooling systems remove that heat and release it into the environment. A planned Niagara energy district could capture it and distribute it to nearby factories, schools, hospitals, government buildings, housing, greenhouses, and other large users.
A district-heating network uses insulated pipes to carry heated water between facilities. Because data-center heat is often below the temperature required by older heating systems or industrial processes, large heat pumps may be needed to raise its temperature. Proximity matters: heat users should be planned near the data center so the network is economical and energy losses remain low.
This is not theoretical. Microsoft and the energy company Fortum are developing Finnish data-center projects expected eventually to provide about 40 percent of the district heat required in nearby communities. In Ireland, recovered heat from an Amazon data center supplies public buildings including a university and library.
New York should require every major data-center proposal to include a waste-heat recovery study. In Niagara, the State should evaluate a shared thermal network as part of the original district plan, rather than trying to add one after the buildings are complete.
The Virtuous Energy Cycle
The developer builds new generation and storage.
The system serves the data center and exports dependable excess electricity.
The computers produce heat as they operate.
The heat is captured and delivered to nearby buildings and industry.
Those users buy less natural gas, heating oil, or electricity for heat.
Lower heating demand leaves more energy available to the rest of New York.
Modern grid and thermal infrastructure helps attract additional employers.
This Approach Is Already Emerging
New York would not be inventing the idea of pairing data centers with new generation. It would be improving it.
Ohio reported approving five behind-the-meter natural-gas and fuel-cell plants at data-center sites during 2025, while also developing special tariffs intended to protect other customers.
Governors in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Virginia advanced a 'Bring Your Own Generation' concept that would connect large loads with dependable new generation and faster review.
Pennsylvania has pursued stronger affordability, environmental, transparency, workforce, and community requirements for data-center projects.
Federal regulators are examining co-located generation, large-load reliability, grid-upgrade responsibility, and consumer protection.
Texas and other states are seeing large campuses plan their own behind-the-meter power because public-grid interconnections cannot arrive quickly enough.
Most existing programs stop at 'bring your own power.' This paper proposes the stronger standard: bring more dependable power than you use, and leave the public system stronger than you found it.
Conditions New York Must Require
9 requirements that define success:
- True additionality. The new generation must add capacity. An existing plant must not simply stop serving the public and redirect its output to a private customer.
- Ratepayer protection. The developer must pay the direct and indirect costs primarily caused by its project, with deposits, minimum payments, and financial guarantees protecting the public from abandoned or downsized projects.
- Power before operation. The data center should not reach full load until its promised generation, storage, interconnection, and required grid improvements are ready.
- Guaranteed net contribution. The amount and availability of exported power must be established by contract, independently verified, and enforceable.
- Emergency cooperation. The facility should provide demand response, stored power, or flexible-computing reductions when the grid is under exceptional strain.
- Climate and environmental compliance. The technology must comply with applicable air, water, land-use, and New York climate requirements, including the State's zero-emissions electricity objective for 2040.
- Local benefit agreement. Jobs, training, tax payments, infrastructure, local contracting, and community protections must be specific rather than promotional promises.
- Transparent agreements. Material energy subsidies, special rates, cost allocations, water plans, emissions assumptions, and public obligations should be disclosed.
- Heat recovery planning. Every project must study nearby thermal users and reserve practical routes for a future or immediate district-heating network.
Technology Must Meet the Standard
This position paper does not prescribe one generating technology. New York should invite competing proposals using combinations of hydropower, advanced nuclear energy, geothermal energy, fuel cells, renewable generation, storage, demand flexibility, or other qualifying resources.
It should also avoid claiming that any new plant will automatically produce electricity more cheaply than the existing system. The developer must demonstrate cost competitiveness through transparent assumptions about construction, fuel, financing, maintenance, interconnection, emissions compliance, and useful life.
The public standard should focus on results: dependable net power, affordability, environmental compliance, local benefits, and protection from financial risk.
A Niagara Power-Positive Development District
New York should create a focused planning process for a Niagara Power-Positive Development District. State agencies, NYPA, NYISO, the serving utility, Niagara County, the City of Niagara Falls, neighboring municipalities, labor, educational institutions, community representatives, environmental experts, and prospective developers should work from one integrated plan.
- Identify suitable industrial and brownfield sites away from residential neighborhoods.
- Map realistic electricity, transmission, water, wastewater, fiber, transportation, and thermal connections.
- Set a minimum dependable net-power contribution for exceptionally large loads.
- Establish developer-funded interconnection and infrastructure rules before projects are negotiated.
- Design a shared district-heating backbone and identify anchor heat customers.
- Create enforceable workforce, tax, local-contracting, and community-benefit standards.
- Use a transparent competitive process that rewards the greatest lasting public benefit.
Conclusion
New York does not have to choose between stopping data centers and allowing them to overwhelm the existing grid. It can insist upon a better bargain.
Niagara Falls is uniquely positioned to demonstrate it. The region has water resources, a cool climate, industrial land, energy expertise, generating and transmission infrastructure, international connections, and a community that deserves serious investment. But its existing hydropower must not be treated as a prize for a new data center to consume.
The developer must contribute. It must add generation, improve infrastructure, export dependable excess electricity, recover useful heat, protect ratepayers, and leave the host community better off.
Niagara Falls once helped electrify America's industrial age. With courage, discipline, and creative partnership, it can help power the digital age - while giving New York more energy than it takes.
Sources
New York Independent System Operator. 'Energy-Intensive Projects in NYISO's Interconnection Queue.' August 26, 2025. https://www.nyiso.com/-/energy-intensive-projects-in-nyiso-s-interconnection-queue
New York Independent System Operator. Power Trends 2025 Fact Sheet. https://www.nyiso.com/documents/20142/23494579/2025-Power-Trends-Fact-Sheet.pdf/c0eb52f2-806b-8813-a0cf-171475cf0790
New York Independent System Operator. 2026 Power Trends. https://www.nyiso.com/documents/d/guest/2026-power-trends
New York Independent System Operator. 'Behind-the-Meter Net Generation.' https://www.nyiso.com/behind-the-meter
New York Independent System Operator. Behind-the-Meter Net Generation Resource Guide. https://www.nyiso.com/documents/20142/41887799/Behind-the-Meter-Net-Generation.pdf/c393e9be-c674-1f2d-9996-5f9bbc03f57d
New York State Public Service Commission. Order Instituting Proceeding and Soliciting Comments, Case 26-E-0063, February 12, 2026. https://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7BB040539C-0000-CB26-AEB3-8C865EF3724D%7D
New York Power Authority. 'Niagara Power Project.' https://www.nypa.gov/Power/Generation/Niagara-Power-Project
New York Power Authority. 'NYPA Announces Next Generation Niagara Turbine Milestone.' February 26, 2026. https://www.nypa.gov/News/Press-Releases/2026/20260226-turbine
New York Power Authority. 'Low-Cost Niagara Hydropower Supports Economic Development.' March 26, 2025. https://www.nypa.gov/News/Press-Releases/2025/20250326-jobs
New York State. Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. https://climate.ny.gov/
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority. 'Transmission and New York's Electricity Grid.' https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Offshore-Wind/Focus-Areas/Transmission-NY-Electricity-Grid
U.S. Energy Information Administration. New York Electricity Profile 2024. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/newyork/
U.S. Census Bureau. QuickFacts: Niagara Falls city, New York. 2020-2024 estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/niagarafallscitynewyork/PST045225
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. 'PUCO 2025 End of Year Review.' December 19, 2025. https://puco.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/puco/news/2025-year-recap
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. 'Data Centers and Electricity.' https://puco.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/puco/utilities/electricity/resources/data-centers
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 'Interconnection of Large Loads to the Interstate Transmission System,' Docket RM26-4. https://www.ferc.gov/rm26-4
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 'FERC Launches Aggressive Targeted Action to Speed Large Load Integration.' June 18, 2026. https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/ferc-launches-aggressive-targeted-action-speed-large-load-integration
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Commissioner Rosner, 'Remarks on the Large Load Show Cause Orders.' June 18, 2026. https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/commissioner-rosners-remarks-large-load-show-cause-orders-e-7-e-12-june-18-2026
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Commissioner Rosner, Concurrence on SPP High Impact Large Load Tariff Revisions. January 14, 2026. https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/commissioner-rosners-concurrence-order-accepting-tariff-revisions-subject
New York Independent System Operator. How Competitive Electricity Markets Power New York State's Clean Energy Goals. https://www.nyiso.com/documents/20142/2224547/How-Electricity-Markets-Power-NYS-Clean-Energy-Goals.pdf/819ee0e6-989f-b28e-e3e0-8967bbd4a735
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 'Governor Shapiro Signs Executive Order on Data Center Development.' August 18, 2026. https://www.pa.gov/governor/newsroom/2026-press-releases/governor-shapiro-signs-executive-order-on-data-center-developmen
International Energy Agency. 'Opportunities for District Heating in the Changing Energy Landscape.' December 8, 2025. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/opportunities-for-district-heating-in-the-changing-energy-landscape
International Energy Agency. 'Data Centres and Energy - From Global Headlines to Local Headaches.' https://www.iea.org/commentaries/data-centres-and-energy-from-global-headlines-to-local-headaches
Fortum. 'Fortum and Microsoft's Data Centre Project Spearheads Clean Heat.' https://www.fortum.com/services/heating-cooling/data-centres-helsinki-region
Amazon Web Services. 'District Heating: Using Data Centers to Heat Communities.' March 13, 2024. https://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2024/03/district-heating-using-data-centers-to-heat-communities.html
