Reclaiming God’s Faithfulness: A Biblical and Historical Rebuttal to the New Anti-Jewish Theology.
Based on research & content by Jon Harris.
A troubling wave of anti-Jewish theology is spreading across Catholic and Evangelical online spaces. It dismisses God’s covenant promises to ethnic Israel as obsolete, portrays Jewish people as uniquely cursed or manipulative, and brands any affirmation of a future role for Israel as “Zionist heresy” or dispensational novelty. Some even question Jesus’s Jewish identity or claim the modern state of Israel has no theological significance. This is not fringe; it is gaining traction among conservatives weary of politics and eager to reject anything labeled “liberal.” Yet it corrupts Scripture, undermines Christ’s humanity, and severs believers from two millennia of church teaching. A clear biblical and historical response is urgently needed.
The foundation is Genesis 12:1-3. God promises Abraham a land, a nation, and blessing to all families of the earth. He repeats and ratifies this covenant nine times in Genesis, making it unconditional by passing between the animal pieces alone (Genesis 15). The promise narrows through Isaac and Jacob (renamed Israel), whose twelve sons form the nation. Leviticus 26:40-45 explicitly foretells exile for disobedience, followed by repentance and restoration: “I will remember My covenant with Jacob… and I will remember the land.” Neither Joshua’s conquest nor Solomon’s kingdom fulfills it completely; both are partial. The prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel expand this into a future ingathering and Davidic kingdom. These texts are not symbolic abstractions. They are concrete promises tied to Abraham’s physical descendants.
The New Testament never revokes them. In Romans 9–11, Paul grieves that his “kinsmen according to the flesh” have largely rejected the Messiah, yet he insists God has not rejected them. A “partial hardening” has come upon Israel “until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in,” after which “all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:25-26). The “gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” (11:29). Gentiles are grafted into the olive tree whose root is Israel; they do not replace it. The “mystery” Paul reveals in Ephesians 3 is that believing Gentiles join the Jewish people of God by faith without becoming proselytes. This fulfills, rather than cancels, the Abrahamic promise that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” Jesus Himself is the singular “seed” of Abraham through whom that blessing flows (Galatians 3:16). The church is spiritual Israel composed of Jews and Gentiles, but ethnic Israel retains a distinct future.
Church history overwhelmingly confirms this reading. Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Origen, Cyril of Jerusalem, John Chrysostom, Jerome, and Augustine all taught a future mass conversion of Jews and, in several cases, a literal restoration to the land. Irenaeus and Victorinus expected a third temple in Jerusalem during end-times events. After the Reformation, Martin Bucer, Theodore Beza, and the Geneva Bible emphasized Romans 11. Puritan leaders, Oliver Cromwell’s Whitehall Conference (1655), and Dutch theologians such as Jacobus Koelman taught that ethnic Israel would return to its land and rebuild Jerusalem. Jonathan Edwards, John Gill, Charles Spurgeon, and Martyn Lloyd-Jones all affirmed a political and spiritual restoration of the Jewish people to Canaan. These were not 19th-century innovations or “Judeo-Christian” inventions; they were the plain sense of Scripture held by the church’s greatest minds.
The oft-cited “blessing and cursing” clause of Genesis 12:3 is likewise enduring. It is applied nationally to Israel in Numbers 24 and Obadiah. While the New Testament shows the church endures persecution, the grammatical sense remains: God favors those who favor His people and opposes those who maliciously harm them. Protestant giants like John Calvin and Matthew Henry applied it broadly to ethnic Israel. This does not require uncritical political support for any government. It does require rejecting the slander that Jews are permanently God’s enemies post-70 AD. Such rhetoric echoes the very supersessionism Paul refuted.
Critics claim this view is novel or politically motivated. The opposite is true. The idea that the ingathering occurred entirely before 70 AD lacks any clear pre-20th-century Christian witness. The notion that the church fully absorbs every Abrahamic promise so that ethnic Israel is irrelevant would make Paul’s Romans 9–11 argument incoherent. Affirming God’s faithfulness to Israel does not deny Christ’s exclusivity, promote dual-covenant theology, or demand open borders. It simply trusts that the same God who kept every promise to Abraham will keep His word to the descendants of Jacob. That confidence, Paul says, is the very reason Gentiles can trust the gospel.
The rise of this new anti-Jewish theology is not discernment; it is unbelief dressed as courage. It questions God’s character, severs us from our Jewish roots, and weakens the gospel’s power for “the Jew first” (Romans 1:16). The remedy is simple: read Romans 9–11 again, study the early fathers and the Reformers, and remember that the God who elected Israel has never broken a covenant. When we bless Abraham’s seed by evangelism, prayer, and truth-telling, we stand in the stream of biblical and historic orthodoxy. The promises remain. God is not finished with Israel—and that is very good news for the church.
This has immediate application today. The “protection clause” of Genesis 12:3 and Numbers 24:9 is not a blank check for Israeli policy, but it does call Gentile believers to reject malicious stereotypes that paint Jews as uniquely evil or perpetual enemies. Paul’s logic in Romans 11 is pastoral: if God keeps His word to ethnic Israel, He will keep His word to you. To deny Israel’s future is to undermine the very assurance that sustains Gentile faith. Evangelism remains “to the Jew first” (Romans 1:16). History shows that when the church prayed for Jewish conversion and opposed pogroms—as Puritans did in 1655 and Bickersteth urged in 1841—God opened doors. Today’s online contempt, whether from Catholic traditionalists or Evangelical reactionaries, is the same spirit of replacement theology that the apostles refuted. Stand firm: the olive tree still has living roots. Blessing Abraham’s descendants through gospel witness and honest history is not political naivety; it is obedience to the God who never lies.
For the complete content visit Jon Harris's Substack page @:
https://open.substack.com/pub/jonharris/p/the-new-anti-jewish-theology?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=ywebo
