HAPPY WOMB DAY!

I was inspired to write this post on Mother's Day.

In today's "woke" culture I wonder if Mother's Day is considered "sexist" by some people. We could call Mother's Day "Womb Day."  That would be sexist, but isn't that the point? Here is the reasoning why it actually is quite accurate. 

 

Either gender can embody the characteristics we commonly associate with motherhood.  A mother is caring and nurturing, but surely men can be caring and nurturing too.

Putting children's needs and interests ahead of one's own is in a word "selfless." Mother's are instinctively selfless. But being protective and providing for a family is something we associate with Father's and those are selfless behaviors as well. Behaviors which Mother's perform too.

So in certain respects Mother's Day is sexist. And that is the point!  The biological ability to give birth is what differentiates a woman from a man. We are celebrating the WOMB. 

Only a biological woman can be a mother. A man cannot carry an unborn child and give birth.  And a woman cannot father a child. Men do not have a uterus and woman don't produce sperm. Which is why we also have Father's Day when we will celebrate biological male parents. 

In Hebrew the word for womb is rechem. Rechem is the root for the Hebrew word Rachamim which means mercy and compassion.

The womb's purpose is to nurture and protect a life in order to prepare it for the world. Before the womb can prepare a conceived life for 40 weeks it must recieve a fertilized egg.  But first the egg needs semen. 

The Hebrew word for semen is שֶׁמֶן "shemen."  SHEMEN is also the word for "ointment(s)." Shemen (Hebrew: שמן‎) is the most commonly used word for "oil" in the Hebrew scriptures. Shemen can also mean fertility in Hebrew. 

Shemen is almost certainly the origin for the Latin word "semen" meaning "seed," from which we get our English word "semen."

Oil is used for anointing. So you might say that in order for a womb to produce life, an egg must be anointed. A life is the result of a successful anointing. I can only think of two Biblical stories of a woman having a child without an anointing by a man.  One is in Luke 1:-26-38

Once an egg is anointed, that Life is nurtured in the womb for 40 weeks before he or she is ready to go out to find and fulfill their destiny. There are a few other situations in the Bible when a person who was anointed by God needed a period of "40" to prepare. 

Oil is used to produce Light. Both the Jewish Nation and Yeshua was chosen by God to be a Light to the world. 

Speaking of roles for men and woman, we often associate the man's role with being a protector.  The Hebrew word for protector is Magen (מָגֵן‎). Magen is also literally a shield. The Star of David is called the Magen of David. Magen comes from the root ganan (גנן) which is a verb meaning to defend, cover or surround. The word Magen, shield/protector, is used over 60 times in the Old Testament. 

Before God made his unconditional Covenant with Abram, God told Abram in Genesis 15.1:

“Do not be afraid, Abram. I am your shield, your exceedingly great reward”

 In Moses final blessing to the Children of Israel before they went into the Promised Land (Eretz) of Israel, Moses said to them in Deuteronomy 33.29:

“Happy are you, O Israel! Who is like you, a people saved by the Lord, the shield of your help, and the sword of your majesty!” 

I will wrap up this post with this conclusion: 

- The womb (woman) protects an egg annointed with semen and transformed into a life. 

- Man protects the womb (woman). 

- God preserves and delivers us all.

Psalm 138.7 - "Though I walk in the midst of trouble, you preserve my life; you stretch out your hand against the wrath of my enemies, and your right hand delivers me."

Amen.

P.S.  I have written some posts related to abortion that may be of interest:

The Paradox of Abortion

We Are Unworthy

 Give women better choices. 

 

PUT DOWN EVIL EARLY

To put down evil we have to be able to speak about it!  

Please read this article and consider the implications!!  

How dangerous is China?

I am "walking the talk" literally.  I am on my morning walk.  Please pardon the shaking and breathing. 

THIS IS OUR LAND

 

Enjoy "This Is Our Land" in Yiddish. 

WHAT IS IT ABOUT YIDDISH? 

Yiddish is the Jewish experience wrapped up in a language.  It embodies where we've been. It captures the unique struggles of the Jews. It portrays our passion, pain, joy, humor and worldly insights in words and phrases. 

Since the Babylonians, Persians, Greeks and  Romans conquered the Kingdom of Israel and Judea and scattered the Jews around the world we have had to make countries around the world our home.  

When Jews left Jerusalem, often as slaves, we brought the Bible with us.  Wherever Jews ended up we contributed to society and culture in important and significant ways.  

Sadly, we were often met with hatred. Jews have suffered and survived many attempts to wipe us out. The Holocaust is certainly not the first attempt!!  England and Spain also sought to purge their kingdoms of Jews. 

Ironically, in an effort to survive armies and genocidal attempts, the greatest threat to the Jews may be assimilation.  Yiddish is an example of the paradoxical combination of assimilation and trying to retain Jewish identity.  

In the nick of time, as prophesied thousands of years earlier, but sadly after hope was lost for 6 million Jews, God called the Jews back to the land God Promised. 

Ezekiel 37:11-12

11 "Then He said to me, “Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. Behold, they say: ‘Our bones are dried up; our hope is lost; we are cut off—by ourselves.' 12 Therefore prophesy and say to them, thus says Adonai Elohim: ‘Behold, I will open your graves. I will bring you up out of your graves, My people. I will bring you back to the land of Israel.

The story of the Jews rise and fall and rise is the greatest and most amazing story ever told. It is called the Bible.  

Commenting on a verse in Leviticus that describes the curses that will befall the land of Israel, Nachmanides wrote that the devastation of the Eretz Israel “constitutes a good tiding, proclaiming that during all our exiles, our land will not accept our enemies... Since the time that the Jews left it, [the land] has not accepted any nation or people, and they all try to settle it... This is a great proof and assurance to us.”

Nachmanides, Moses ben Nahman, commonly  referred to as the Ramban, was a leading medieval Jewish scholar, Sephardic rabbi, philosopher, physician, kabbalist, and biblical commentator. The 13th-century scholar wrote that Israel will remain desolate until the Jewish People assume control. But when the people of Israel finally return to the land of Israel, the region will once again flourish thanks to Divine providence.

Mark Twain is the most famous eyewitness to the 19th-century desolation of the land that the Roman emperor Hadrian renamed Syria-Palaestina, after the Jews two traditional enemies, the Syrians and the Philistines, to punish the Jewish people for their insurrection  for the Bar-Kochba Revolt of 132-136 CE. 

Twain was an unwitting collaborator of Nachmanides when he penned "Innocents Abroad" and brought global attention to the sorry state of Palestine and proved it was a "land without a people" just 15 years before the very first waves of Jewish immigration. Twain couldn't have foreseen the Balfour Declaration in 1917, the Six Day War, and how Israel would rise from the ashe and flourish. 

This week Israel will celebrate it's 73rd year of Independence.  What Israel has accomplished with a treeless, natural resourceless, desolate land is remarkable. Nobody would believe if it wasn't true. What's equally remarkable is that it happened according to God's plan.

ONLY GOD COULD HAVE PREDICTED IT 2600 YEARS BEFORE IT ALL HAPPENED IN THE BIBLE.  THE STORY ISN'T OVER . . . 

HAPPY 73RD ISRAEL!!

SMART PEOPLE HAVE FIGURED IT OUT!

THERE IS A GIANT POWER GRAB HAPPENING.  WE MUST NOT LET IT! 

The Left is moving us towards a government that is controlled by "one party" - in other words - toward tyranny.  The future of our democratic process in America 

I have very intelligent friend who happens to be Chinese.  Since February, she have been doing a lot of work around the subject of election integrity, including online research, conversations with elected officials and grassroots conservatives, and reviewing state laws and pending legislation. 

Below is a summary of her thoughts in two parts, because it's a rather long summary. I recommend that you read the attached information on H.R.1 as well, which will give you a sense of what the Democrats want to do to our election system:

1.     Our Election System Is Broken

More than 200 years ago, the framers set forth guiding principles for our nation governed by the people, for the people through representatives chosen by the people.  A fair and free election system has been the cornerstone of the American Experiment, where people have confidence that the elected officials truly represent the will of the people.
 
Unfortunately, that trust broke down with the 2020 election. According to a Rasmussen poll conducted November 17-18, 2020, 47% of likely voters, including a third of Democrats, believed that the process was “rigged” against President Trump. 
 
Although the Democrat machine, with support from the liberal media, Big Tech, and the courts, convinced their base that there was no evidence of widespread fraud, the rest of the world knows that the emperor has no clothing. 
 
A 2019 report published by the Electoral Integrity Project, an independent project based out of Harvard University, found that U.S. elections from July 2012 through December 2018 rated "lower than any other long-established democracies and affluent societies." 
 
The U.S. score of 61 – the same score as Mexico and Panama – is the second-lowest among liberal democracies and much lower than other countries in the Americas, including Costa Rica, Uruguay and Chile. Clearly, our Republic is in crisis, both at home and abroad. America has lost its moral authority and our image of the “shining city on a hill” has been tarnished.
 
Instead of repairing a broken system and restoring citizens’ confidence in our democracy, under the guise of fighting against “voter suppression,” Democrats are on a warpath to destroy any safeguards against voter fraud by shoving H.R.1/S.1 (see summary attached) through Congress. If passed, the law will legitimize every illegal means to steal an election. Pelosi and Schumer are either tone-deaf, or more nefariously, hell-bent to maintain one-party rule.
 
2.     Democrats’ Claim of “Voter Suppression”

I loathe the notion of “voter suppression.” The founding fathers bestowed upon us the sacred duty to choose the leaders of our nation, and that solemn duty, like rearing children, is not meant to be easy. It requires individual effort and engagement. At the minimum, an elector should understand the ideological and policy differences between two candidates. JFK has warned us: “The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

Somehow, some people in the country now consider voting a nuisance. They forget that brave men and women sacrificed their lives to protect our right to vote, that citizens in other countries like China don’t have the right to vote, and that right now young people in Hong Kong are sent to jail for demanding the right to vote.

Those people are too lazy to get off the couch and wait in line at polling stations. They expect the federal government to register them to vote, pay for mail-in ballot postage and put drop boxes at their front door. 

Democrats are too eager to oblige. Anything less becomes “voter suppression.” Any requirement to prove voter legitimacy becomes subversion to our voting rights. Ironically, they are not applying the same logic to our Second Amendment Rights in their zealous pursuit to take guns away from citizens. 

Granted, guns in the wrong hands can lead to innocent deaths, but so can ballots cast by characters with malicious intent. An unsecured election is more susceptible to foreign interference. Giving millions of ballots to an ineligible population can override the will of American people and threaten our national security.

Calling H.R.1 “The People’s Act” is akin to putting lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig. It is not an act to return power to the people, but to secure power of the ruling elites. Contrary to Democrats’ claims that they are acting on behalf of We the People, a March 2021 Rasmussen poll shows that 75% of Americans support voter ID laws that require individuals to show photo identification before voting, including almost 70% of black voters.
 
In addition, a 2019 study from the National Bureau of Economic Research demonstrated that voter ID laws have no adverse impact on minority voter turnout. Similar to promoting law and order instead of defunding the police, minority communities may actually benefit from a secure election system. Rampant voter fraud in cities such as Baltimore, Detroit and Philadelphia has depleted black voters the opportunity to elect legitimate leaders who can lead their communities out of perpetual poverty and high crime rates.

Source:  Name withheld.  

 

CAN A MONSTER FIND PEACE?

NY Senators join mounting calls for Cuomo to resign. 

Now all of us can see the hubris, gigantic ego and incredible narcissism of Cuomo.  He thinks he is more important and powerful that EVERYONE combined. 

Cuomo puts himself above what is best for the entire State of NY. He actually believes he can survive what no other politician in America or the Western world could! 

Through his resistance to do what any normal politician would do, Cuomo is only proving what a horrendous person he is. He is a MONSTER!!

Justice is coming for Andrew Cuomo. He is going to spend out his years as a political pariah - an outcast from the Democrat party - in the prison of his mind.

I suspect there will be serious attempts to rename the Tapanzee Bridge back again. 

The ultimate irony is that Andrew has permanently stained the "Cuomo name." His brother Chris will also have to live with that. Andrew Cuomo hasn't just brought shame to himself, he has shamed his entire family.  He will have to face his father, Mario, in his private thoughts.

I wonder .... at some point in the pit of despair after MUCH soul searching, will Cuomo turn back to his faith and genuinely repent and seek forgiveness?  If so, he won't only have to do so for the woman he abused and the thousands of families whose parents were killed as a result of his nursing home policies. Cuomo will have to face the fact that he put through the most horrible grotesque abortion laws in America. 

Can this man with the most massive ego do what he must do to find peace? Will he be able to humble himself before his fellow and God?  Will the monster Andrew Cuomo find peace or will he spend the eternity of his day's on earth in a private hell of his own making?  

With Passover and Pentecost just weeks away, Andrew Cuomo would be wise to put his faith to the test. 

Deuteronomy 32:35 tells us:

Vengeance is Mine, and recompense;Their foot shall slip in due time; For the day of their calamity is at hand, And the things to come hasten upon them.’

Proverbs 20:22 teaches us: 

Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.

ANOTHER REASON TO GET RID OF COLUMBUS

The history of Jews in the "Americas" began at the same time as the history of America -- with Columbus.  Consider the history of the Jewish community in San Salvador.  

Facts: 

- Columbus brought a Hebrew/Aramaic translator along on his voyage in 1492 but not a priest.  

- Many of the crew were "Converso's" (Jews forced to convert to Catholicism during the Spanish Inquisition).  

- Columbus set sail in 1492, the year of the Spanish Inquisition ordering the brutal conversion and murder of all Jews in Spain.

- Colombus postponed his planned departure by one day so as not to set sail on the cursed Jewish day of Tish B'Av.

- Linguistic traits in his writings indicate that Columbus was raised learning Ladino, a hybrid form of Castilian Spanish, comparable to Yiddish, which was spoken by Spain’s Sephardic Jewish community. 

- On all but one of Columbus’s letters to his son, Diego he ended with a traditional Hebrew blessing. He never did so to letters outside his family.

- Columbus’ voyage was not, as is commonly believed, funded by the deep pockets of Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos and another prominent Jew. Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez advanced an interest free loan of 17,000 ducats from their own pockets to help pay for the voyage, as did Don Isaac Abarbanel, rabbi and Jewish statesman.

- Columbus’s first announcement of his voyage’s discoveries went to the treasurer of Aragon, the former Jew, de Santangel.

In Spain in Columbus's time it was fatal to admit being a Jew, so it stands to reason that his true ethnic origin is murky. There is no physical historical evidence of Columbus’s roots. He may be the ultimate Marrano - A secret Jew.

By the same token, Columbus was on a mission to convert the people in the land he was destined for to Christianity.  So you could say that America's Judeo Christian roots trace back to Columbus.

On second thought, perhaps that is another reason Godless Leftist Progressive Socialists are so determined to wipe Columbus from our true American history and replace him with Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project.

TRIVIA:  The flag of Israel can trace it's roots back to a Colombus Day parade in Boston 1891. 

If the subject of Columbus's Jewish roots interests you further. 

MAKING SENSE OF THE EQUALITY ACT

The House of Representatives voted on Thursday to pass the Equality Act, a bill that would ban discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity. It would also substantially expand the areas to which those discrimination protections apply.

The Civil Rights Act covered discrimination in certain areas, like employment and housing. The Equality Act would expand that to cover federally funded programs, as well as "public accommodations" — a broad category including retail stores and stadiums, for example.

Importantly, the bill also explicitly says that it trumps the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (commonly known by its acronym RFRA). The law, passed in 1993, set a higher bar for the government to defend laws if people argued those laws infringed upon religious freedom.

Under the Equality Act, an entity couldn't use RFRA to challenge the act's provisions, nor could it use RFRA as a defense to a claim made under the act.  (You better bake that cake whether you want to or not!) 

I wonder what is to stop a lawsuit against a pastor who objects to performing a same sex marriage. 

I have read the actual legislation that passed in the House. This is my read. 

The Equality Act extends established protections to one's gender identity. The Bill literally inserts wording into existing laws in order achieve that. The effects and implications of the Equality Act go further.

Gender as defined by genital developed in the womb is irrelevant legally. Biological sex is subordinate to choice.  

In effect the child (minor) has superiority over their parents in making the choice of their sex. It would be presumptuous for a parent to assume the sex of their child at birth. I wonder, if in the future it will be legal for a doctor to tell an expecting parent that they are having a "boy" or a "girl."

Biological males will be free to compete in "women's sports" and biological males are free to enter "ladies" rooms. So long as they "identity" as women. 

Where is the issue?  It depends on who you ask and on the situation. Some see this as a matter of personal freedom and the right one has to non-discrimination. In that respect, it may seem that America is moving down the path toward being a more progressive and just Nation. But that depends on whose rights are being protected. 

If one thinks otherwise, is to be considered a bigot and phobic. To act otherwise is to risk committing a Federal discrimination or hate crime. 

The biblical view of the sexes is in effect immoral at best and quite possibly may lead to illegal behavior. 

Are we a more just nation if a biological man who identifies as a female can take out his penis in the shower with your daughter? Ask the biological man and you get one answer.  Ask the father of a little girl and you might get another.

Are we a more just nation if a 9 year old child can be counseled and prescribed puberty blocking drugs without parental consent?  And what if that child grows up to regret their decision?  What will the politicians who superseded their parents response be then?

Are we a more just nation if women's sports and records of achievement are decimated by biological men?  Ask the biological male MMA fighter who nearly killed his female opponent and you get one answer. Ask her and you might get another.

Women have struggled for centuries to get to where they are today in sports. With the stroke of a pen, the Left threatens their gains. A women who worked tirelessly her entire life for an athletic achievement can have that taken away from her permanently because of radical politics. It's happening already.

Are we a more just nation if we force people to act against their religious beliefs to please the view of people who think that God's definition of Man and Woman is trumped by the United State's legal view?

Like I said, it depends on who you ask and on the situation. 

None of this speaks to the science. None of this speaks to studies of the failures of gender reassignment. None of this speaks to the psychological damage of altering one's gender through drugs and surgery.  None of this speaks to the rights of parents. 

The Equality Act puts government above parents, science and God. 

None of this speaks to love either. The thing that creates the most dissonance for me personally is the following.  While I disagree with the Equality Act, I still may love a person who suffers from Gender Dysphoria. My heart can empathize with their confusion, fear, pain and other struggles, even though I support the rights of those who dissent with the Equality Act.

To me personally, the great injustice of the Equality Act is what Liberals believe it turns anyone who disagrees with it into. 

THERE, DOES IT MAKE SENSE NOW?